| Foreword |
|
13 | (4) |
|
Professor Michael F. GOODCHILD |
|
|
| Introduction |
|
17 | (4) |
|
Rodolphe DEVILLERS and Robert JEANSOULIN |
|
|
| PART 1. Quality and Uncertainty: Introduction to the Problem |
|
|
Chapter 1. Development in the Treatment of Spatial Data Quality |
|
|
21 | (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
1.3.1. Accuracy beyond position |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
1.3.2. Topology and logical consistency |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
Chapter 2. Spatial Data Quality: Concepts |
|
|
31 | (12) |
|
Rodolphe DEVILLERS and Robert JEANSOULIN |
|
|
|
|
|
31 | (3) |
|
2.2. Sources and types of errors |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
2.3. Definitions of the concept of quality |
|
|
35 | (6) |
|
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
Chapter 3. Approaches to Uncertainty in Spatial Data |
|
|
43 | (18) |
|
Peter FISHER, Alexis COMBER and Richard WADSWORTH |
|
|
|
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
3.2. The problem of definition |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
3.2.1. Examples of well-defined geographical objects |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
3.2.2. Examples of poorly defined geographical objects |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
|
51 | (3) |
|
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
3.8. Conclusion: uncertainty in practice |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
|
|
56 | (5) |
| PART 2. Academic Case Studies: Raster, Chloropleth and Land Use |
|
|
Chapter 4. Quality of Raster Data |
|
|
61 | (28) |
|
Serge RIAZANOFF and Richard SANTER |
|
|
|
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
|
62 | (19) |
|
4.2.1. Image reference system and modeling of the viewing geometry |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
4.2.1.1. Image reference system in matrix representation |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
4.2.1.2. Direct and inverse localization |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
4.2.1.3. Geometric transforms of images |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
4.2.1.4. Acquisition models |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
4.2.2.1. Georeferenced image |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
4.2.2.3. Orthorectified image |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
4.2.2.6. Localization error |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
4.2.2.7. Mean quadratic error |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
4.2.2.8. Error vector field |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
4.2.2.9. Native projection of a map |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
4.2.3. Some geometry defects |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
4.2.3.1. Absolute localization defect |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
4.2.3.2. Global defects of internal geometry |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
4.2.3.3. Local defects of internal geometry |
|
|
75 | (4) |
|
4.2.4. Localization control and global models |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
4.2.5. Internal geometry control |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
|
|
81 | (6) |
|
4.3.1. Radiometry quantities |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
4.3.2. Overview of the radiometric defects |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
4.3.2.1. Diffraction and defocalization |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
4.3.2.2. Polarization of the instrument |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
4.3.3. Calibration of the radiometric data |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
4.3.3.1. Radiometric calibration |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
4.3.3.2. Spectral calibration |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
4.3.4. Atmospheric correction |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
Chapter 5. Understanding the Nature and Magnitude of Uncertainty in Geopolitical and Interpretive Choropleth Maps |
|
|
89 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
5.2. Uncertainty in geopolitical maps |
|
|
91 | (3) |
|
5.2.1. Locational uncertainty in geopolitical maps |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
5.2.2. Attribute uncertainty in geopolitical maps |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
5.3. Uncertainty in interpretive maps |
|
|
94 | (6) |
|
5.3.1. Construction of interpretive polygonal maps |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
5.3.2. Uncertainty in boundaries of interpretive polygonal maps |
|
|
96 | (2) |
|
5.3.3. Uncertainty in attributes of interpretive polygonal maps |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
5.4. Interpretive map case studies |
|
|
100 | (3) |
|
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
|
104 | (3) |
|
Chapter 6. The Impact of Positional Accuracy on the Computation of Cost Functions |
|
|
107 | (16) |
|
Alfred STEIN and Pepijn VAN OORT |
|
|
|
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
6.2. Spatial data quality |
|
|
108 | (7) |
|
6.2.1. Positional accuracy |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
6.2.2. The meta-model for spatial data quality |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
6.2.5. The variance-covariance equation |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
|
|
115 | (5) |
|
|
|
115 | (3) |
|
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
Chapter 7. Reasoning Methods for Handling Uncertain Information in Land Cover Mapping |
|
|
123 | (18) |
|
Alexis COMBER, Richard WADSWORTH and Peter FISHER |
|
|
|
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
7.3. Well-defined objects: error, probability, and Bayes |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
7.4. Poorly-defined objects: spatial extent, vagueness, and fuzzy-set theory |
|
|
127 | (3) |
|
7.5. Poorly defined specification: ambiguity, discord, non-specificity and expert knowledge |
|
|
130 | (7) |
|
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
7.5.2. Using expert knowledge to reason with uncertainty |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
7.5.3. Formalisms for managing ambiguity |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
7.5.3.1. Discord, experts and Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
7.5.3.2. Non-specificity, experts, and qualitative reasoning formalisms |
|
|
134 | (3) |
|
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
|
138 | (3) |
| PART 3. Internal Quality of Vector Data: Production, Evaluation and Documentation |
|
|
Chapter 8. Vector Data Quality: A Data Provider's Perspective |
|
|
141 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
8.2. Providing vector geographical data |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
8.2.1. Data quality and usability |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
8.2.2. Aims of a national mapping agency |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
8.2.3. Vector geographical data |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
8.3. Data quality needs of the end user |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
8.3.1. Users' understanding of their needs |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
8.3.2. Data providers' understanding of user needs |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
8.4. Recognizing quality elements in vector data |
|
|
145 | (6) |
|
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
8.4.3. Positional accuracy |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
8.4.4. Attribute accuracy |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
8.4.5. Logical consistency |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
8.4.5.1. Connectivity in vector data |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
8.5. Quality in the capture, storage, and supply of vector data |
|
|
151 | (5) |
|
8.5.1. Overview of the data capture to supply process |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
8.5.1.1. Capture specifications |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
8.5.1.2. Quality control of vector data |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
8.5.1.3. Quality assurance of vector data |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
8.5.2. Quality in data capture |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
8.5.2.1. Field capture of vector data |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
8.5.2.2. Photogrammetric capture of vector data |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
8.5.2.3. External sources for vector data |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
8.5.3. Quality in the storage and post-capture processing of vector data |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
8.5.4. Quality in vector data product creation and supply |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
8.6. Communication of vector data quality information to the user |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
8.7. Conclusions and future directions |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
Chapter 9. Spatial Integrity Constraints: A Tool for Improving the Internal Quality of Spatial Data |
|
|
161 | (18) |
|
Sylvain VALLIERES, Jean BRODEUR and Daniel PILON |
|
|
|
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
|
|
163 | (3) |
|
9.3. Topological relations and international geomatics standards |
|
|
166 | (2) |
|
9.4. Definitions and concepts: the components of integrity constraints |
|
|
168 | (5) |
|
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
9.4.1.1. The extension tangent |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
9.4.1.2. The extension borders |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
9.4.1.3. The extension strict |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
9.4.2. Cardinality associated with predicates |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
9.5. Documentation and use of integrity constraints |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
9.5.1. Documenting spatial integrity constraints |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
9.5.2. Validation of integrity constraints (inconsistency) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
9.6. Production and validation of geographic data |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
9.6.1. Validating the spatial integrity of geographic data |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
Chapter 10. Quality Components, Standards, and Metadata |
|
|
179 | (32) |
|
Sylvie SERVIGNE, Nicolas LESAGE and Thérèse LIBOUREL |
|
|
|
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
10.2. Concepts of quality |
|
|
181 | (5) |
|
10.2.1. Quality reference bases |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
10.2.2.1. Qualitative criterion |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
10.2.2.2. Quantitative criterion |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
10.2.3. Expression of the quality |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
10.2.4. Precision and accuracy |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
10.2.5. Appraisal and use of quality |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
10.3. Detailed description of quality criteria |
|
|
186 | (11) |
|
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
10.3.2. Positional accuracy or geometric accuracy |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
10.3.3. Attribute accuracy or semantic accuracy |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
|
|
189 | (2) |
|
10.3.5. Logical consistency |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
10.3.6. Semantic consistency |
|
|
192 | (2) |
|
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
10.3.8. Temporal consistency |
|
|
194 | (2) |
|
10.3.9. Quality criteria: difficulties and limitations |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
10.4. Quality and metadata as seen by standards |
|
|
197 | (10) |
|
10.4.1. Introduction to standardization |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
10.4.2. Background of geographic information standards |
|
|
198 | (3) |
|
10.4.3. Standards relating to metadata and quality |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
10.4.4. Theoretical analysis of ISO/TC 211 standards |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
10.4.4.1. The ISO 19113 standard |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
10.4.4.2. The ISO 19114 standard |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
10.4.4.3. The ISO 19115 standard |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
10.4.4.4. ISO 19138 preliminary draft technical specification |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
10.4.5. Standardized implementation of metadata and quality |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
10.4.5.2. The model for exchange by transmission |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
10.4.5.4. Metadata of geographic objects |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
|
|
208 | (3) |
| PART 4. External Quality: Communication and Usage |
|
|
Chapter 11. Spatial Data Quality Assessment and Documentation |
|
|
211 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 | (2) |
|
11.1.1. Quality in its context |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
11.1.2. Outline of chapter |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
11.2. Denotation as a radical quality aspect of geographical data |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
11.3. Sources for the fluctuations in denotation |
|
|
214 | (6) |
|
11.3.1. The modeling of the world |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
11.3.2. The modeling of operations |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
11.3.3. Realization of the model of operations |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
11.3.4. Realization of the model of the world |
|
|
216 | (3) |
|
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
11.4. How to express denotation quality |
|
|
220 | (13) |
|
11.4.1. General principles for the assessment of denotation quality |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
11.4.1.2. Measure for measure |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
11.4.1.4. Validity intervals |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
11.4.2. Toward a few measures |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
11.4.3. Geometry measures |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
11.4.3.1. Punctual objects |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
11.4.3.3. Surface objects |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
11.4.6. Indirect measures |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
11.4.7. Measures on modeling |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
|
|
233 | (4) |
|
Chapter 12. Communication and Use of Spatial Data Quality Information in GIS |
|
|
237 | (18) |
|
Rodolphe DEVILLERS and Kate BEARD |
|
|
|
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
12.2. Data quality information management |
|
|
238 | (2) |
|
12.3. Communication of data quality information |
|
|
240 | (4) |
|
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
12.3.2. Data quality visualization |
|
|
241 | (3) |
|
12.4. Use of quality information |
|
|
244 | (3) |
|
12.4.1. Warnings and illogical operators |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
12.4.2. Quality-Aware GIS |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
12.5. Example: multidimensional user manual prototype |
|
|
247 | (2) |
|
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
|
|
250 | (5) |
|
Chapter 13. External Quality Evaluation of Geographical Applications: An Ontological Approach |
|
|
255 | (16) |
|
Bérengère VASSEUR, Robert JEANSOULIN, Rodolphe DEVILLERS and Andrew FRANK |
|
|
|
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
13.2. Quality and ontology |
|
|
256 | (3) |
|
13.2.1. Quality definition and external quality |
|
|
256 | (2) |
|
13.2.2. Complexity of external quality evaluation |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
13.2.3. Concept of ontology |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
13.3. Representation of external quality |
|
|
259 | (7) |
|
13.3.1. Improvement of quality process |
|
|
259 | (1) |
|
13.3.2. Geosemantical integration |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
13.3.3. Stages allowing external quality evaluation |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
13.3.3.1. Conceptualization and initial formalization (Stage 1) |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
13.3.3.2. Expected and internal quality matrices (Stage 2) |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
13.3.3.3. Comparison and utility: example of an application in transportation (Stage 3) |
|
|
264 | (2) |
|
13.4. Discussion and conclusion |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
|
|
267 | (4) |
|
Chapter 14. A Case Study in the Use of Risk Management to Assess Decision Quality |
|
|
271 | (12) |
|
Gary J. HUNTER and Sytze DE BRUIN |
|
|
|
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
14.1.1. Information quality and decision-making |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
|
|
272 | (1) |
|
14.2. Determining the required decision quality |
|
|
272 | (2) |
|
14.3. Using risk management to assess decision quality |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
14.4. Dealing with risk in the decision |
|
|
275 | (2) |
|
14.5. Case study: determining the volume of sand for a construction site |
|
|
277 | (4) |
|
14.5.1 Case study description |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
14.5.2. Description of the data and model to be used |
|
|
278 | (2) |
|
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
|
|
281 | (501) |
|
|
|
782 | |
|
Chapter 15. On the Importance of External Data Quality in Civil Law |
|
|
283 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
283 | (2) |
|
15.2. Applicable general civil liability regimes |
|
|
285 | (12) |
|
15.2.1. Liability regime of an act or fault of another |
|
|
286 | (5) |
|
15.2.2. Liability regime of an act of a thing |
|
|
291 | (6) |
|
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
|
|
297 | (4) |
| Appendix. Quality, and Poem Alike |
|
301 | (4) |
|
|
|
| List of Authors |
|
305 | (2) |
| Index |
|
307 | |