Acknowledgments |
|
x | |
|
|
xi | |
Introduction: On the Quest for Explanation |
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
Explanation through minimization |
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program |
|
|
4 | (6) |
|
The computational process |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Which type of derivational theory is preferable? |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Explanation through representational minimization |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (9) |
|
On the Status of Representations and Derivations |
|
|
19 | (23) |
|
|
Representations and derivations -- the status of the mixed theory |
|
|
19 | (3) |
|
Restrictiveness and duplication |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
Representations or derivations |
|
|
22 | (5) |
|
Derivational theories and weak representationality |
|
|
22 | (3) |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
|
27 | (6) |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
Derivational explanation? |
|
|
29 | (3) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (9) |
|
|
42 | (23) |
|
|
Basic properties of X'-Theory |
|
|
44 | (5) |
|
|
49 | (8) |
|
Subcategorization and Merge |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
The Minimal Link Condition |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
Labels at the PF interface |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
|
61 | (4) |
|
Rule Applications as Cycles in a Level-Free Syntax |
|
|
65 | (25) |
|
|
|
Introduction: the role of Minimalist method |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
DBP's general argument for cyclic Spell Out |
|
|
67 | (4) |
|
Background: the DBP feature system |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
The general DBP argument that Spell Out must be strongly cyclic |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
The problem with the general argument that Spell Out must be strongly cyclic |
|
|
71 | (3) |
|
A derivational approach to the problem of cyclic Spell Out |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (7) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (3) |
|
|
82 | (2) |
|
|
84 | (6) |
|
|
90 | (16) |
|
|
|
Filters versus constrained operations |
|
|
90 | (4) |
|
Crash-proof syntax and computational efficiency |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (4) |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
|
103 | (3) |
|
|
106 | (27) |
|
|
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
LF islands without binary quantification? |
|
|
113 | (3) |
|
Binary quantifiers with no associated LF islands? |
|
|
116 | (2) |
|
A ``definiteness effect'' in nonexistential contexts |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
|
120 | (4) |
|
The interpretation of weak determiners |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
A binary treatment for negation |
|
|
125 | (3) |
|
Conclusions and further questions |
|
|
128 | (5) |
|
Pronouns and Their Antecedents |
|
|
133 | (34) |
|
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
More on Condition C and on apparently antecedent-less pronouns |
|
|
138 | (3) |
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
|
143 | (4) |
|
Why are there reflexives? |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
|
148 | (2) |
|
Backwards pronominalization |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
Condition C reconstruction effects |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
Further Condition C reconstruction effects |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
``Transitivity of coreference'' |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
Split antecedents and overlapping reference |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
|
158 | (9) |
|
Scrambling, Case, and Interpretability |
|
|
167 | (17) |
|
|
Scrambling and binding relations |
|
|
167 | (4) |
|
Specifying the mechanisms of scrambling |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
A strongly derivational model of syntax |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
A derivational analysis of binding relations |
|
|
175 | (3) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
179 | (5) |
|
Resumption, Successive Cyclicity, and the Locality of Operations |
|
|
184 | (43) |
|
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
The core pattern and some initial issues |
|
|
185 | (3) |
|
The form of complementizers |
|
|
188 | (3) |
|
|
191 | (2) |
|
Mixed chains -- movement and binding |
|
|
193 | (9) |
|
|
194 | (3) |
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
202 | (4) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
Successive cyclic effects |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
206 | (7) |
|
|
213 | (5) |
|
|
218 | (9) |
|
Very Local A' Movement in a Root-First Derivation |
|
|
227 | (22) |
|
|
Expletive-associate relations |
|
|
229 | (2) |
|
|
231 | (5) |
|
|
236 | (9) |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
Contained relative clauses in Japanese |
|
|
238 | (2) |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
|
241 | (2) |
|
|
243 | (2) |
|
|
245 | (4) |
|
Arguments for a Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations Based on Clitics |
|
|
249 | (20) |
|
|
|
249 | (3) |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
Strict derivationality: the first two arguments from Romance |
|
|
252 | (8) |
|
The first argument: French and Italian |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
The second argument: Spanish versus French/Italian |
|
|
254 | (6) |
|
|
260 | (4) |
|
Raising-to-object or control? |
|
|
260 | (4) |
|
|
264 | (5) |
|
Issues Relating to a Derivational Theory of Binding |
|
|
269 | (36) |
|
|
|
269 | (3) |
|
Anaphoricity as acquired information |
|
|
272 | (3) |
|
|
275 | (10) |
|
|
275 | (1) |
|
|
276 | (1) |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
Binding restricted to A-positions |
|
|
280 | (2) |
|
Local obviation (Principle B) |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
Absence of nominative anaphors |
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
|
285 | (5) |
|
|
290 | (3) |
|
A few words on remaining problems |
|
|
293 | (1) |
|
|
294 | (11) |
Index |
|
305 | |