Series editor's preface |
|
ix | |
Introduction |
|
1 | (4) |
1 Euthanasia and medical power |
|
5 | (17) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
The Dutch euthanasia debate |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
Beginnings of the euthanasia movement |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
The lack of a theoretical foundation for euthanasia |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
Dutch euthanasia as a contradiction of respect for patient autonomy |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
Euthanasia as hindrance to a good death |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
|
19 | (3) |
2 The growth of medical power |
|
22 | (35) |
|
|
22 | (3) |
|
Medical—ethical uncertainty |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
|
27 | (4) |
|
The changing medical scene |
|
|
31 | (8) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
A new focus on death and dying |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
Development of the practice of euthanasia |
|
|
46 | (4) |
|
The issue of public control |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
Public debate and the politics of compromise |
|
|
51 | (6) |
3 The medical practice of euthanasia |
|
57 | (34) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
General description of Dutch euthanasia cases |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Incidence of medically procured death (MPD) |
|
|
59 | (11) |
|
Who practises euthanasia? |
|
|
70 | (5) |
|
The doctor–patient relationship |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
The physician's role in the decision-making process |
|
|
77 | (6) |
|
Evaluation of the practice of euthanasia |
|
|
83 | (6) |
|
|
89 | (2) |
4 The response of the law |
|
91 | (42) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
The relevance of the Dutch legal developments for other countries |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (3) |
|
|
96 | (3) |
|
Jurisprudential developments |
|
|
99 | (6) |
|
|
105 | (5) |
|
Who can speak on behalf of the medical profession? |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
110 | (9) |
|
|
119 | (4) |
|
The role of the prosecutor |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
Legalization of euthanasia |
|
|
125 | (6) |
|
|
131 | (2) |
5 Justifying the practice of euthanasia |
|
133 | (36) |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
The importance of distinctions |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Euthanasia versus letting go |
|
|
135 | (6) |
|
Euthanasia versus palliative treatment |
|
|
141 | (7) |
|
|
148 | (3) |
|
Voluntary versus nonvoluntary MPD |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
Different methods of ethical reasoning |
|
|
152 | (3) |
|
The Model of Double Effect |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
Unbearable suffering and the patient's quality of life |
|
|
161 | (4) |
|
|
165 | (4) |
6 Lessons to be learned |
|
169 | (18) |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
Medicalization of end-of-life care |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
Medical interventions and control over human death |
|
|
173 | (3) |
|
Inevitability of judgements about patients' quality of life |
|
|
176 | (3) |
|
Powerlessness of the law, public debate and policy |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
The importance of distinctions |
|
|
180 | (3) |
|
Towards a broader array of end-of-life care options |
|
|
183 | (4) |
Appendix I: Digest of Dutch jurisprudence |
|
187 | (24) |
Appendix II: 2001 Law on Euthanasia and PAS |
|
211 | (9) |
Notes |
|
220 | (7) |
References |
|
227 | (8) |
Index |
|
235 | |