Introduction |
|
ix | |
Overview |
|
xi | |
PART I: HISTORY, CRITICS AND PRACTICAL COMPATIBILITY OF THE CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT AUDIT AND TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT |
|
|
Standards and Assumptions of the Curriculum Management Audit |
|
|
3 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
|
Critical Assumptions of the Audit |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
School Systems as Rational Organizations |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Explication of the Audit Standards |
|
|
7 | (8) |
|
What the Curriculum Management Audit Doesn't Advocate |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (3) |
|
Background and Criticisms of the Curriculum Audit and Total Quality Management |
|
|
19 | (14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 | (7) |
|
The Curriculum Management Audit |
|
|
26 | (4) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
30 | (3) |
|
|
33 | (32) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
Downey's Quality Fit Framework |
|
|
34 | (3) |
|
Deming's Profound Knowledge |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
A Logical Connection and the Overlay of Quality |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
First Prong: Quality Fit Framework |
|
|
41 | (4) |
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
Summary of the First Prong Analysis |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Second Prong: Deming's Profound Knowledge and Fourteen Points Overlay |
|
|
48 | (11) |
|
Summary of the Second Prong |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
Summary and Recommendations |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
62 | (3) |
|
The History and Context of the Curriculum Audit |
|
|
65 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
Audits as External-Internal Eyes on School System Management |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
School Accountability and the Audit |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
The Impact of State Equity Trends |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
State Agency Involvement in Curriculum Auditing: The Kentucky Experience |
|
|
69 | (6) |
|
National and International Use of the Audit |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
Challenges for Second Generation Audits |
|
|
75 | (4) |
|
The Future of the Curriculum Audit |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (5) |
PART II: CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT AUDIT STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES |
|
|
|
85 | (48) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
Policy Focus: The First Step Toward Control |
|
|
87 | (11) |
|
Administrative Structure Focus: Providing for Control (Table of Organization/Job Descriptions/Stability) |
|
|
98 | (8) |
|
Planning Focus: A Third Step Toward Control |
|
|
106 | (5) |
|
Other Critical Aspects of Standard One |
|
|
111 | (8) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (13) |
|
|
133 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
|
134 | (7) |
|
Questions Underlying Standard Two Analysis |
|
|
141 | (5) |
|
Data Sources for Standard Two Analysis |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
Issues and Variables Related to Standard Two Analysis |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
Typical Findings in Standard Two Analysis |
|
|
148 | (2) |
|
Recommendations to Enhance Standard Two Performance |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
The Connectivity and Equity Standard |
|
|
153 | (32) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
Connectivity and Consistency |
|
|
156 | (5) |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
Dimensions of Equity Analysis |
|
|
163 | (14) |
|
Equity Analysis Summation |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
Connectivity and Staff Development |
|
|
177 | (4) |
|
Connectivity and Instructional Monitoring |
|
|
181 | (2) |
|
Standard Three Conclusions |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
|
185 | (28) |
|
|
|
|
|
The Purpose of a School District Assessment Program |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
Developing a District Assessment Program |
|
|
186 | (2) |
|
Components of an Assessment Program |
|
|
188 | (4) |
|
Using Other Student Test Data |
|
|
192 | (14) |
|
Determining Motivation Potential of the School: A Case Study |
|
|
206 | (4) |
|
Audits, Reviews, and Other Data Assessment Systems |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
Audit Criteria for Judging the Quality of an Assessment Program |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
The Productivity Standard |
|
|
213 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
214 | (5) |
|
Data Sources for Standard Five Analysis |
|
|
219 | (2) |
|
Typical Findings in Standard Five Analysis |
|
|
221 | (4) |
|
Typical Recommendations for Standard Five Findings |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
The Use of the Camera in Standard Five Data |
|
|
226 | (3) |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
229 | (2) |
|
Preparing the Board, the District, and the Community for the Curriculum Audit |
|
|
231 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
|
232 | (2) |
|
After You Have Decided to Have an Audit |
|
|
234 | (3) |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
Upon Receipt of the Final Report |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
Ongoing Public Relations and Communications Strategies |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (3) |
|
|
243 | (4) |
PART III: THE CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT AUDIT: RESEARCH EVIDENCE AND SUPERINTENDENTS TESTIMONIALS |
|
|
Benefits of the Audit: The Superintendents Speak |
|
|
247 | (30) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
|
248 | (29) |
|
A Follow-Up Study of Three School Districts |
|
|
277 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
|
278 | (3) |
|
Results of Implementation-Impact Survey |
|
|
281 | (3) |
|
Analysis of Research Questions |
|
|
284 | (7) |
|
|
291 | (2) |
|
|
293 | (2) |
|
Implications for Funding Audits |
|
|
295 | (1) |
|
|
295 | (2) |
About the Editors |
|
297 | (2) |
About the Authors |
|
299 | (4) |
Index |
|
303 | |